Sunday, 23 May 2021

SCI Loot by Hospitals

 

DECCAN  INQUIRER

Weekly e news paper

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.02.....Issue.21.................26/05/2021

 

 

 

 

Editorial  : Private  Hospitals  Robbing  Patients

-         PIL  Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India

 

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/pvt-hospitals-are-robbing-covid19-patients-plea-in-sc-seeks-guidelines-for-admission-of-patientsfees-and-discharge-from-hospitals-160916

 

https://youtu.be/EYLZugXs2KI

 

https://youtu.be/-j2IeDAXmi0

 

Now  crores of Indians are facing life threatening  covid disease. Even in these trying times private hospitals linked to politicians are fleecing money from patients. Politicians in power are part of this  loot  and not enforcing  government  mandated price caps and bed reservations.

 

Many affluent  persons having lakhs of rupees property and income have got BPL ration cards using their connections. By virtue their BPL card those rich people get  free medical treatment in hospitals, free ration, etc. Whereas poor , needy persons without any connections don't   have BPL card they neither get free medical treatment or free ration. They either die by hunger or lack of medical care.

 

Government  declare  it does not have enough money to buy oxygen, ventilators , to build  emergency hospitals. Whereas it  is spending crores of rupees on unnecessary  projects like central vista , flyovers,  etc. Government is failing in prioritising  spending.

Above two movie clip web links aptly describes  hospital scenario.

 

Hereby we request Honourable  Supreme Court of India  to order central and state governments :

 

1.      To reimburse   medicals Bills  of Ministers , judges , MLAs , MPs  towards covid treatment or other ailments only if admitted in government hospitals.

2.      To  scientifically  fix prices of ICU beds, ventilators , medicines,  medical care charges specifically for COVID treatment and immediately  enforce it on private hospitals.

3.      To order government to take  control of erring private hospitals under NDMA Act forthwith.

4.      To allot hospital beds in both government and private hospitals on scientific basis  not on the basis of recommendations by powers that be.

5.      To order central and state governments to immediately stop  low priority projects and to divert that money for covid care.

6.      To order Ram Janma bhoomi trust , TTD , Malankara church and Jamia Masjid  ( who have collected crores of rupees public donation ) to  lend money  to government  as loan towards covid care.

7.      To strictly maintain accountability of  covid expenses by governments.

8.      To initiate  criminal prosecution of  rich people with BPL cards.

9.      To  extend free health care , free ration facilities to needy even if they don't have BPL card.

10.  To admit all patients even if without money to pay for admission,  treatment. To initiate  criminal prosecution  of doctors , hospitals who refuse treatment of poor.

 

With Regards

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

 

Cruel  Greedy COVID  Hospital

 

       On June 24, when Mayanka Sanghotra learned that her mother, Narender Kaur, had tested positive for COVID-19, she was naturally alarmed. She could not get through to any of the government helpline numbers listed online, but she did discover that Shanti Mukand Hospital, located about ten minutes away from her home, was dedicated to patients infected by the novel coronavirus. Within hours, Sanghotra had her mother admitted to the hospital.The doctors at Shanti Mukand said the 52-year-old Narender’s condition was critical. She had very unstable oxygen levels. Sanghotra was prepared to do anything to ensure the best possible medical intervention, so when she was told that the hospital offered a COVID package for Rs 4 lakh and they would start the treatment immediately when she deposited the amount, she agreed.The package included Rs 36,500 per day for a bed without a ventilator (Rs 30,000 for the bed and Rs 6,500 to provide PPE kits to the hospital’s staff). Everything else, depending on the number of days Narender Kaur would spend in the hospital and the type of medical services she would require, would be calculated upon her discharge. Since Sanghotra could not withdraw more than Rs 50,000 per day from her bank, she paid the Rs 4 lakh in instalments.The doctors assured Sanghotra that her mother’s condition was slowly improving. But there were problems. Within two days, Narender had to be put on non-invasive ventilation (NIV) oxygen support. On July 1, Sanghotra was informed that her mother did not have a pulse and now needed a ventilator.

 

 “The doctors still said that at least her condition was not deteriorating,” Sanghotra recalled.She was asked to arrange for three injections, each for Rs 40,000. Then she was asked to procure the anti-viral drug remdesivir. It was apparently out of stock at the hospital pharmacy.“It was only available on the black market for prices ranging from Rs 30,000 to Rs 80,000. The doctors had asked for six vials,” said Sanghotra. She managed to get four vials from the hospital pharmacy itself. About a week later, on July 10, she received the other two directly from the manufacturer, whom she was able to call thanks to some of her contacts.The bill that Mayanka Sanghotra was asked to clear.Soon after this, she received a call from the hospital’s billing department. As of July 5, they told her, her bill had exceeded Rs 7.5 lakhs.“I was confused. If there was a package for Rs 4 lakhs, how was the bill Rs 7.5 lakhs?” she said.The billing department gave her an elaborate breakup of the costs. “This included costs for everything, including sanitisers, all in lakhs! Did the COVID package include nothing needed for COVID treatment?” Sanghotra wondered.Sanghotra had seen a small notification somewhere that the Delhi government had put a price cap on the treatment of COVID-19 in private hospitals. When she asked the hospital about it, they would not give her a direct answer. So she went home and started looking for help online.She got in touch with Malini Aisola, the co-convenor of the All India Drug Action Network (AIDAN). Together, they navigated several rounds of negotiations with everyone involved.Amresh Kumar, a member of the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Delhi, got in touch with Sanghotra and promised to help her. “But instead of intervening, the government representative actually abandoned Mayanka to negotiate on her own,” said Aisola. “The role of the government representative was to step in and ensure the hospital followed the government rules. But all he told Mayanka was, ‘try and negotiate and maybe they will give you a 10% discount’.’’Acting on Kumar’s suggestion, Sanghotra went to Dr Tejender Pal, a physiotherapist at Shanti Mukand, that very day for help. Pal directed her to Dr Mohan Dube, the hospital’s director of medical services (DMS).

 

 In a supposed display of altruism, Dube assured her that if she deposited Rs 5 lakh with the hospital by the following Monday, he would help convince the management to decide in their favour.“How was it in my favour when a government price cap existed?” Sanghotra asked.Also Read: We Need to Consider Nationalising Private Hospitals if We Are to Avert a Total DisasterAn order ignoredOn June 20, the Delhi government had issued an order capping prices for COVID-19 treatment in private hospitals. The order said: “…All COVID beds would be at rates given by the Committee subject to upper limit of 60% of the beds of total hospital bed capacity.”The order explicitly specified the rates. All National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare-accredited hospitals, such as Shanti Mukand, could charge no more than Rs 10,000, Rs 15000 and Rs 18,000 respectively for a bed in the isolation ward, a bed in the ICU without a ventilator and a bed in the ICU with ventilator support.Although the order exists on paper, many private hospitals work their way around it and charge patients much more than the specified limits.“No one at the hospital ever told me about the existence of this order!” Sanghotra observed.On July 11, Sanghotra wrote a complaint letter with the subject: “Grievance regarding billing of patient Mrs Narender Kaur for COVID-19 treatment in violation of Delhi Government Order of 20 June 2020” and sent it to the hospital authorities as well as the Delhi government.In response to this letter, Amresh Kumar and Dube told her over a conference call that ‘things could have been resolved with discussions’.On July 14, Aisola accompanied Sanghotra to the hospital to meet Dube

 

Dube told them that Sanghotra should write an application regarding her financial constraints with respect to the payment of the hospital bill. He instructed Dr Samrul Hoda from the billing department to ensure that Narender Kaur’s case was dealt with at the prices set by the government.A poster released by Shanti Mukand. Photo: Facebook/shantimukandhospitalHoda went through Sanghotra’s application in detail. He told her and Aisola that they could escalate the matter all they wanted, but the pharmacy bills of almost Rs 3 lakhs had to be paid separately, irrespective of the government cap.When the two women reminded Hoda of the conversation with Dube, he said he was following Dube’s instructions. When the women asked to confirm this claim, Hoda said Dube’s phone was unreachable at the moment.“We said our primary concern was just to get Mayanka’s mother the medical attention she needed. We were there for a resolution, not a fight,” said Aisola.There was no sense to the pharmacy bills. “Most tests and treatments I was billed for were already included in the package!” said Sanghotra. By then, she had deposited about Rs 3.5 lakhs with the hospital and saw no reason to pay the pharmacy bills separately.On July 17, Hoda called Sanghotra and said: “Either arrange the payment or you can take the patient out of this hospital.”Sanghotra was shocked. “This was so unethical. How can a person from a hospital say things like this? I was depressed and helpless,” she said.On the evening of July 17, however, the billing department of Shanti Mukand Hospital asked Sanghotra to settle her bills according to the government-specified rates. She paid Rs 4.22 lakhs and they asked her to deposit an advance for the next few days. She paid Rs 18,000 in advance for one day.Photograph of the final bill. Photo: By arrangementTwo hours later, Sanghotra received a call from the hospital. Her mother’s oxygen levels were unstable, she was told. A few minutes later, she received another call. Narender Kaur had gone into a cardiac arrest. By the time Sanghotra got to the hospital at 9:30 pm, her mother had been declared dead.Questions, but no answersOn July 26, I asked Hoda about the COVID-19 packages at Shanti Mukand Hospital. He gave me the figures specified in the Delhi government order of June 20 and assured me that the hospital abided by these rules.Then I asked him to confirm if this practice had been adhered to completely since June 20. “I am afraid I cannot discuss these details,” he said, adding that charges go higher when patients insist on better facilities, such as an air-conditioned single room.I asked if this was what had happened with Narender Kaur.He said he could not recall such intricate details. “There’s always an undertaking, though,” he added.Also Read: Majority of Politicians Who Contracted COVID-19 Have Preferred Private HospitalsBut the hospital refused to provide a copy of the undertaking to Sanghotra, even though the AAP’s Amresh Kumar had told her that patients and their relatives have the right to demand such documents from hospitals. So far, this too remains unresolved.When I got in touch with Amresh Kumar of the AAP on August 3, he took two days to respond to my queries. On August 5, he told me: “I do not recall the particular details of this case. There are far too many cases that we have to oversee. But from what I recall, this was a case of overcharging and as is usual in such cases, I put them in touch with the DMS. The patient and the DMS take it [forward] from there.”Kumar added that the last time he had communicated with Sanghotra was during the conference call on July 11, when he spoke with her and Dube. However, though that conference call took place after Sanghotra had sent her complaint letter to the hospital authorities and the Delhi government, Kumar denied any knowledge of the letter.When I told him that Sanghotra’s mother, Narender Kaur, had been declared dead after the bills were finally settled, Kumar said: “That conference call was the last communication I had with them. I have no information after that. You can send me the patient number if the issue has not been resolved yet, and I can then try to help.”Not an isolated caseSanghotra’s story is unfortunately not an isolated case. In a virtual press conference on June 25, several civil society groups, including AIDAN, Anveshi Research Centre for Women’s studies, and 18 others, highlighted the failure of the government’s price cap in private hospitals. With no transparent information system for the public and not much effort by the authorities to enforce the order, COVID-19 patients not only suffer from the illness but also to pay for treatment.When patients approach hospitals for immediate medical requirements, there is already a serious power difference between the two parties, said Inayat Singh Kakar of the People’s Health Movement at the virtual press conference. “It becomes very difficult to challenge the hospital or the government under such duress. It is like trying to fight with your hands tied!” she said.Representative image of a COVID-19 hospital. Photo: PTI“These stories are still just the tip of the iceberg,” Jashodhara Dasgupta from Sahayog said. “It is expected that at least in times like this, the private sector will keep its ideas of profiteering aside and stand in solidarity with people who are suffering. It is unfortunate that we find such unabashed and unethical ways of profiteering and exploitation.”“It is unethical and it is mental harassment,” said Sanghotra. “Private hospitals have a fixed mindset: we need money by hook or by crook.”

 

It has been more than a month since the Delhi government issued its order capping prices of treatment, but grievances like Sanghotra’s have not been resolved. The civil society groups at the press conference released a letter to government authorities such Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and Lt Governor Anil Baijal. The letter urged them to take action on complaints, establish a formal grievance redressal system, ensure transparency on rates, provide real-time information on fixed-rate beds capacity, extend price caps to all ICU beds and check on the indiscriminate use of drugs like remdesivir and favipiravir.“Over 80% of our doctors are in the private sector; 93% of hospitals are privatised and 64% of hospital beds are in the private sector. So, given a pandemic, it is impossible for the people of this country to limit their healthcare requirements only to the public sector,” said Dasgupta.However, Sanghotra, who is now dealing with her mother’s last rites, said: “I have learnt the biggest lesson of my life: to never, ever go to a private hospital.”Sweta Dash is associated with the Right to Food campaign.

 

How Indian doctors and private hospitals are fleecing patients and corporates

-         Ritesh Kumar Singh

 

Most Indians consider doctors as next to God if not God. We still have many doctors with impeccable ethical records. However, there are many others - not so ethical, and their number is on the rise who don’t think twice before taking their patients for a ride.

 

The arrest of top doctors (including the CEO of Hiranandani Hospital Dr. Sujit Chatterjee) in connection with a kidney transplant case on August 9 is not a rare incident of unethical (and maybe illegal) business practice at big private hospitals in Indian cities.

 

 

 

Some of the common tactics used by money-minded Indian doctors to cheat or fleece gullible patients of their hard earned money are:

 

Prescribing more tests than necessary - to be done at preferred labs (whether in-house at big hospitals or outside labs) for hefty commissions. Sometimes these tests are not even conducted on the samples taken, and fake results are given. By the way, have you heard about sink tests?

Keeping you admitted at hospital rooms when you’re fit to be discharged. A doctor attempted this trick with my son at a hospital in Andheri.

Prescribing expensive medicines/vaccines when cheaper and quality substitutes are available. Often many such medicines/vaccines are available only at prescribed chemist shops. That benefits pharma companies and the doctors who prescribe them but inflate the bills for patients.

Charging patients at different rates for the same treatment. Top private hospitals are charging according to the room a patient selects even for the same operation by the same doctors in the same operation theatre.

Fake operations – this is how it happens. A doctor can assess that you can be made to pay. He will say that you need an urgent operation when you don’t really need it. If you’re still not convinced he’ll say that he needs to send a tissue from your throat for testing whether it has a cancerous cell. Most of us don’t argue with our doctors. So you’ll agree. He’ll admit you and give you anaesthesia.

Unconscious you will be wheeled into operation theatre where your conscious relatives will be not be allowed. After few hours, you’ll be taken out drowsy. After you wake up the doctor will come and say that he has sent your tissue for testing though he doesn’t think you got cancer but he wants to be doubly sure. Can you argue? This again has happened with one of my relatives. After the operation, the doctor simply forgot that he has to discuss the test results before the operation he was very concerned. When my relative approached him to discuss the results of the test even without looking at the reports he smiled and said nothing to worry.  

Use of stent in heart disease treatment even if not needed – 1 stent may cost a patient anything between Rs. 60,000 -100,000 or more depending upon the status of hospitals or pockets of gullible patients. It's not uncommon to give stents to patients at 3 times the import price. Worse, it may be harmful and may cause death yet doctors take bribes to recommend stents.

 

 

Gynaecologists at private hospitals are well-known to force pregnant women to go for C-section which pays better than normal deliveries.

Last but not the least, is luring poor and uneducated people for agreeing to donate organs, kidney in particular, for which there is no dearth of high paying customers as highlighted by the arrests at Hiranandani Hospital in Mumbai and Appolo in Delhi.

Genesis of the problem

 

With profit making being their main motive, private hospitals are pushing doctors through a system of incentives and disincentives to over-bill using whatever means – ethical or unethical – they can think of. With seats in the subsidized government medical colleges being limited, many medical aspirants opt for private medical colleges that charge hefty capitation fees. This makes doctors vulnerable to the whims of private hospitals that pay good money to their empanelled doctors – needed to recover high investments in medical education.

 

With seats in the subsidized government medical colleges being limited, many medical aspirants opt for private medical colleges that charge hefty capitation fees. This makes doctors vulnerable to the whims of private hospitals that pay good money to their empanelled doctors – needed to recover high investments in medical education.

 

This makes doctors vulnerable to the whims of private hospitals that pay good money to their empanelled doctors – needed to recover high investments in medical education.

 

Implications

 

Most of the readers of this post are likely to be the salaried professionals. We all get health cover provided by our employers who pay the premiums to insurance companies.

 

Insurance premiums are negotiated almost every year and rates are decided on the basis previous years claims. The more the claims in the current year, the higher the premium would be next year.

 

Thus, patients or their employers (in the case of salaried people) have to indirectly bear the rising cost of healthcare in the form of high and rising insurance premiums. Since it’s the patients or their employers who’re really bearing the rising cost of health care, insurance companies don’t object to rising medical malpractices unless the net claim payments exceed the premiums received.

 

Worse, they may try to benefit from that by raising insurance premium rates for unorganized individual cover seekers. If you don’t believe me…please try to check what premium your employer is paying for Rs. 500,000 cover and how much you’re paying for your self-financed plan. Premium could be as high as 300-400%.

 

Not only this. Cashless facilities - which most of us prefer but most of the insurance don't - again attract very high premium rates. Reimbursable claims are preferred by the insurance companies because they often reject some of the charges by saying that those are not covered.

 

To cut the long story short, doctors, private hospitals, pharma companies and often insurance companies are having fun at the cost of individuals, and corporates.

 

The way forward

 

MCI is not effective in checking malpractices and corruption in medical field, a system of the standardized treatment protocol or SOPs may help check some abuse but may constrain doctors in treatment. In some cases, it may raise the cost of treatment. Preferred hospital network system though has improved convenience, but is enough to check unscrupulous doctors.

 

Can economics provide any insights to help addressing the growing menace of medical malpractices? We’d like to submit that tweaking the system of incentives and disincentives, and improved access to information and a more transparent healthcare market more transparent will help.

 

Incentives

 

Increasing the supply of seats in govt. medical colleges and capping capitation fee will reduce the investment cost of medical students and hence their vulnerabilities to give in to uncontrolled pursuit of profit by private hospitals that pushes them to cheat and overbill.

 

Access to information and transparency

 

Mandatory recording, archiving and sharing of the recording with patients or their representatives

 

At present, private hospitals do publish the credential of its specialist doctors like education and past experience. How about adding the following information as well say about its gynaecologists:

 

Total deliveries in the last 3 years

Normal deliveries

C-section

Such information will help patients take informed decisions about which doctor to go to for a treatment. Maybe, the doctors (especially those who're ethical and there are still many) should come forward and provide the above information whether asked or not.

 

Rating and ranking of top specialist doctors in fraud prone specializations such as kidney transplant, gynaecology and heart - by a third party independent agency and the ratings to be made available online – without any restrictions

 

Rating of hospitals based on basic infrastructure, charges, indicators of ethical business practices like how many medical malpractice suits filed against...

 

Disincentives

 

The above measures can check most of the malpractices but not all. For serious deviant, stringent punishments including permanent disbarment and imprisonment will be needed.

 

Individual actions by patients

 

Aggrieved patients should take their grievances to consumer courts which are cheaper, faster and don’t require lawyers for representation. Some nice suggestions on how to approach consumer courts for medical malpractice/negligence can be found here. In addition, given the pervasiveness of the internet and social media, it's important that we share our experiences - good as well as bad with doctors and hospitals. If we do, unethical doctors and hospitals will start losing patients that will force them to change their ways. Similarly, good doctors and hospitals should be promoted.

 

What corporate can and should do? 

 

Indian corporates are cutting corners to survive in a sluggish economic environment. Yet they are paying hefty insurance premiums that keep on rising almost every year. How about studying your last 5 years’ insurance bills?

 

Corporates, especially the bigger ones with bigger insurance bills are advised to hire in-house doctors and medical lawyers to investigate being taken for a ride by unethical doctors, hospitals, and take remedial actions.

 

 

 

Post Script: And the above is about better off sections of society. Just imagine how vulnerable the workers of unorganized sector are before such doctors and hospitals since they don’t get health cover facilities from their employers…so most of them go without insurance cover as individual health covers are very expensive.

 

COVID  Care Fundamental  Right

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2021/05/covid-care-fundamental-right.html?m=1 

 

 

FIR against COVID Hospitals

https://dalit-online.blogspot.com/2021/05/fir-against-covid-hospitals.html?m=1

 

 

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @  # LIG-2   No  761,

HUDCO  FIRST  STAGE , OPP WůATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL

,MYSURU – 570017  KARNATAKA  INDIA     Cell : 91 8970318202

  WhatsApp  91  8970318202

 

Home page :

http://di.dalitonline.in  

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com   

 

Contact  :  DI@dalitonline.in   , deccan.inquirer@gmail.com   

 

 

 

Thursday, 20 May 2021

FIR against Covid Hospitals

 

DECCAN  INQUIRER

Weekly e news paper

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.02.....Issue.20................19/05/2021

 

FIR against 4 hospitals in Andhra Pradesh for irregularities in Covid treatment

 

The hospitals started admitting patients on the condition that no bills would be given to them. This is apart from the irregularities of excessive charging and misappropriation of Remdesivir vials, Director General, Andhra Pradesh Vigilance and Enforcement Department KV Rajendranath Reddy said.

An FIR was filed against four private hospitals in Andhra Pradesh on Friday after the Flying squads of the state Vigilance and Enforcement Department found irregularities and malpractices on their part in providing Covid treatment.

 

The hospitals started admitting patients on the condition that no bills would be given to them. This is apart from the irregularities of excessive charging and misappropriation of Remdesivir vials, Director General, Andhra Pradesh Vigilance and Enforcement Department KV Rajendranath Reddy said.

 

 FIR has been registered against these hospitals under Disaster Management Act, KV Rajendranath Reddy said. (ANI file photo. Representative image)

An FIR was filed against four private hospitals in Andhra Pradesh on Friday after the Flying squads of the state Vigilance and Enforcement Department found irregularities and malpractices on their part in providing Covid treatment.

"The flying squads have continued inspections of hospitals on Friday. The teams have inspected 15 hospitals so far and found irregularities in four hospitals and booked criminal cases against the management of all the hospitals involved," Director General, Andhra Pradesh Vigilance and Enforcement Department KV Rajendranath Reddy said.

Hospitals started admitting patients on the condition that no bills would be given to them. This is apart from the irregularities of excessive charging and misappropriation of Remdesivir vials, he added.

"Narayana Hospital, Guntur was charging exorbitant prices beyond prescribed rates and no bills were given for payment made. Sai Rathna Hospital in Anantapur and Jangareddygudem hospital in West Godavari district were also charging excessively, discouraging admission of patients under the ArogyaSri welfare scheme, and misappropriation of Remdesivir. Kumar Hospitals, Arilova in Visakhapatnam was not giving bills. FIR has been registered against these hospitals under Disaster Management Act," Reddy said.

 

 

 

 

Limitations and Distortions of Profit-Based Health Systems

in Book Review — by Bharat Dogra

 

            In the course of facing the ongoing challenge of the pandemic, a sad reality that has  manifested itself time and again is that profit-driven health systems are unable to respond effectively to such crisis situations. There are several disturbing anecdotes  of how the profit driven systems and the individuals running them behaved in a selfish and callous way towards patients. These anecdotes get talked about and disturb us a lot, but in reality these are only the more obvious manifestation of more widely pervasive and deeper problems which may be causing a lot of problems and distortions even in normal times without attracting much criticism because these distortions have been ‘normalized’ in the system. It is very important to recognize this as a systems problem and not just as sporadic manifestations, as without such recognition and understanding it is not possible to bring the necessary reforms.

Another important aspect of this problem is that if such a distorted system exists in a very rich country, some of its ill-effects can be checked because a lot of funds are available. However when some poorer countries try to copy parts of this system, or else pressures are exerted on them to do so, then these countries are unlikely to have the funds to check these ill effects. Hence much more harmful impacts may result. Hence it is even more important in these countries to recognize and  understand these distortions and to avoid them. It is in this wider context that careful study and documentation of profit-driven health systems has a very important role.

The USA health system is regarded as  a very important example of a profit-driven health system and some important and useful studies of the distortions that exist here have emerged in recent years. However the book being discussed here has a very special relevance in this literature. This book titled  Doctored – The Disillusionment of an American Physician’ has been written by Dr. Sandeep Jauhar and published by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. Dr. Jauhar has been the Director of the Heart Failure Program at a leading US hospital and has also written regularly for the New York Times.

The special relevance of this book is that the author is not at all ideologically or otherwise a critic of the system to start with. In fact he is very eager to succeed in this system and to serve it well and he is willing to work very hard for this. One may say that he is very keen to succeed within the system as it is, he is obviously a talented and bright professional and he is willing to give his best to make the system work and to succeed. But he is also basically a very honest person at heart and he is troubled when he sees wrongdoing.

He has a strong sense of ethics and would like to go by it , even though he is also keen to be a success. If in the process of his routine work or on the road to success, he sees a violation of ethics which will  obviously harm someone sooner or later, directly or indirectly, he is troubled and tries to avoid violation of  ethics if he can. What happens then? This is useful to learn from the book. As he sees these problems around him, he also studies and finds out some wider problems, or data relating to this, which he shares with readers. So as he goes by understanding the system he has joined with high hopes, he shares his feelings with the reader and the reader joins in his discovery and understanding of the less pleasant realities of the generally brightly portrayed  heath system of the richest country in the world.

In this book Dr. Jauhar has portrayed a highly commercialized system in which doctors who want to be honest to their profession feel very helpless and hence are exposed to high levels of depression. In a survey of 12,000 physicians, only 6 per cent described their morale as positive! The majority of them said they did not have enough time to spend with their patients because of paperwork. In the USA, among professions, physicians have the highest suicide rate. One American doctor kills himself (or herself) every day.

One doctor said on Sermo, the online community of more than 1,25,000 physicians, “Working up patients in the ER these days involves shortgunning multiple unnecessary tests (everybody gets a CT!) despite the fact that we know they don’t need them, and becoming aware of the wastefulness of it all really sucks the love out of what you do. I feel like a pawn in a money-making game for hospital administrators.”

Another doctor quoted in this book says, “You’re doing things, and you’re doing them because you’ve got to be doing them, but you’ve thinking, why the hell am I doing this?”

One doctor regrets, “We allowed the insurance companies to come between us and our patients.”

Dr. Jauhar says, “Year after year, health care spending grew faster than the economy as a whole. Premiums for insurers like Blue Cross, whose reimbursement rates were determined by doctors, increased 25 to 50 per cent annually. Meanwhile reports of waste and fraud were rampant.”

A Congressional investigation found that surgeons performed 2.4 million unnecessary operations resulting in nearly 12,000 deaths.

The Institute of Medicine estimated that wasteful health spreading (that does not improve health outcomes) costs $750 billion in the USA every year.

A study published in the England Journal of Medicine found that one in five Medicare patients discharged from the hospital was readmitted within a month. One in three was readmitted within three months.

Dr. Donald Berwick and Dr. Allan Detsky wrote in the Journal of American Medical Association that inpatient care at teaching hospitals has become a relay race for physicians and consultants, and patients are the batons.

Researchers have found that a doctor who owns a nuclear scanner is seven times as likely as other doctors to call for a scan. Between 1987 and 2006 the exposure of Americans to radiation increased by seven times, primarily because of CT scans. The number of CT scans in the USA in one year is around 70 million.

Patients are overexposed to a battery of specialists, several of whom they do not need, while the doctor who knows a patient best is often not involved in her or his care at the time of hospitalization. Dr. Jauhar gives one example, “A fifty-year old patient of Oni’s was admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath. During his month-long stay, which probably cost upward of $200,000, he was seen by a hematologist; an endocrinologist; a kidney specialist; a podiatrist; two cardiologists, a cardiac electrophysiologist; an infectious-diseases specialist; a pulmonologist; an ear, nose and throat specialist; a urologist; a gastroenterologist; a neurologist, a nutritionist; a general surgeon; a thoracic surgeon; and a pain specialist. The man underwent twelve procedures, including cardiac catheterization, a pacemaker implant, and a bone marrow biopsy (to work up mild chronic anemia). … When he was discharged (with only minimal improvement in his shortness of breath), follow-up visits were scheduled for him with seven specialists.”

Dr. Jauhar comments, “Patients don’t always require specialists. Patients often have “overlap syndromes” (we used to call it aging), which cannot be compartmentalized into individual problems and are probably best managed by a good general physician. When specialists are called in, they are opt to view each problem through the lens of their specific organ expertise. Patents generally end up worse- I have seen it over and over again.”

Medicare imposed a requirement that antibiotics be administered to a pneumonia patient within 6 hours of arriving at the hospital. Doctors often cannot diagnose pneumonia so quickly, but because of Medicare requirement antibiotics were given despite all-too-evident dangers to patients.

Introduction of surgical report cards which rewarded lower mortality led to a strong tendency to avoid more serious patients. As a research report stated, “Mandatory reporting mechanism inevitably gives providers the incentive to decline to treat more difficult and complicated patients. …Observed mortality declined as a result of a shift in incidence of surgeries towards healthier patients.”

In New York state 63 per cent of cardiac surgeons acknowledged that because of report cards, they were accepting only relatively healthy patients for heart bypass surgery. 59 per cent of cardiologists said it had become harder to find a surgeon to operate on their most severely ill patients.

Despite very high spending on health the USA lags behind in health achievements. According to the Commonwealth Fund, a health care research group, the US ranks forty-fifth in life expectancy (behind Bosnia and Jordan). Among developed countries, it is almost at the bottom of the list when it comes to reducing infant mortality. Similarly it is near the last place in terms of health care quality access and efficiency.

What is more, as Dr. Jauhar tells us, “…within the USA, regions that spend the most on health care appear to have higher mortality rates than regions that spend the less, perhaps because of increasing hospitalization rates that result in more life-threatening errors and infections.”

Dr. Jauhar concludes, “I am convinced of one thing; the vast majority of doctors aren’t bad. It is the system that makes us bad, makes us make mistakes.” He says that more doctors are willing to stay till late and provide good care, but  “they are struggling to do so in a system that is diseased.” The most disturbing part of what Dr. Jauhar says is that most doctors realise that the system is forcing them into a situation in which they cannot be honest to their profession, yet feel so trapped by the system that they can’t resist it enough to find the honest way out.

It is these words of the system being diseased which are most important and convey the wider grim reality. It is not a question so much of criticizing any individual doctor’s actions but what is much more important is that a truly honest and ethical doctor finds it so difficult to work within the system without making compromises with which his conscience does not really agree and which leave an uneasy feeling. To his great credit, Dr. Jauhar is so frank with his readers that he does not hesitate to tell how he and his own family  members are also driven to make some compromises with differing levels of willingness ( or reluctance) and the frank discussions that take place among doctors in which any initial reluctance to make such compromises is ridiculed and frowned upon. We see situations in which trying to work honestly and with ethics is fraught with difficulties while compromises which involve ethical violations make it easy to work and join the road to career and economic gains as well. In other words it is much easier to be dishonest ( up to a level) than to be honest in this system. It a system in which there is more reluctance to treat patients in more difficult conditions and more eagerness to take up relatively healthy patients and to expose them to a number of unnecessary specialist treatments and tests!

At this stage I would like to leave Dr. Jauhar ( as his account was written before COVID-19) and raise a question which is relevant to more recent times—how would such a profit-driven system respond to the new and increased challenges of a pandemic? Will it respond in a most honest and rational way that is needed? Isn’t honesty ( or full freedom from monetary and financial aspects while taking a decision concerning welfare of people) related to the rationality of the response?

All these aspects are even more relevant in poorer and developing countries where there is a tendency to bring in aspects of the same profit driven system, driven by same or similar narrow interests. In India for example we see a clear trend with emphasis shifting from public to private health care, and from basic health care for all to insurance based systems, ie from providing health care to buying health care. Here also we see increasing and sometimes shocking commercialization of health system, from medical education to actual treatment, and the growing distress of the idealists who want to serve honestly and who want to prioritize serving the poor and the neglected people  in rural areas. Clearly there is a clear case for systems reform, here as well in the richest countries like the USA.

 

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @  # LIG-2   No  761,

HUDCO  FIRST  STAGE , OPP WůATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL

,MYSURU – 570017  KARNATAKA  INDIA     Cell : 91 8970318202

  WhatsApp  91  8970318202

 

Home page :

http://di.dalitonline.in  

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com   

 

Contact  :  DI@dalitonline.in   , deccan.inquirer@gmail.com   

 

 

COVID care Fundamental Right

 

DECCAN  INQUIRER

Weekly e news paper

Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.02.....Issue.19................12/05/2021

 

 

COVID  care Fundamental  Right – Supreme Court of India

 

Terming the right to health as a fundamental right which includes affordable treatment, the Supreme Court on Friday said it is the duty of the state to make provisions for affordable treatment during this unprecedented pandemic.

“It is a world war against Covid-19. Therefore, there shall be a government-public partnership,” a bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan said while adding, “It cannot be disputed that for whatever reasons the treatment has become costlier, it is not affordable to the common people at all.”

“Even if one survives from Covid, many a time, financially and economically he is finished. Therefore, either more provisions are to be made by the state government and local administration or there shall be a cap on the fees charged by private hospitals,” the bench said in its 17-page order.

The court also asked all states and Union Territories to set up committees to conduct monthly fire safety audit of hospitals, including the ones treating Covid patients. The court said every state must appoint a nodal officer responsible for ensuring adherence to fire safety norms in hospitals.

Every state must act vigilantly and work with the Centre harmoniously. It is time to rise to the occasion. Safety and health of the citizens must be the first priority rather than any other considerations,” the order reads.

The court also directed the authorities to conduct more testing and to declare correct facts and figures. 

“One must be transparent in number of testing and in declaring the facts and figures of the persons who are Covid positive. Otherwise people will be misled.” 

 

 

 

Rights  in  COVID times

 

Indian government needs to urgently address healthcare shortages amid the world’s fastest-growing Covid-19 crisis and ensure that vulnerable communities have equitable access to treatment. The government to end curbs on free speech and to respect human rights in its pandemic response.

 

Following widespread criticism of its handling of the pandemic, with shortages in oxygen supplies and hospital care costing lives, the Indian government ordered nearly 100 social media posts to be taken down, saying they spread fake information. Most of the content targeted, however, had angrily criticized the government’s response to the crisis. Uttar Pradesh state’s chief minister has denied oxygen shortages and warned that charges would be brought under the draconian National Security Act against anyone, including healthcare workers, spreading “rumors” on social media to “spoil the atmosphere.”

 

“The Indian government should be focusing only in its efforts on responding to people desperately in need of help and dying for lack of medical care. Instead, what we find is a prickly reaction to legitimate criticism of its handling of the crisis, including by trying to censor social media.”

 

India’s new Covid-19 infections broke the global record, with over 320,000 cases recorded on April 27, 2021, plus nearly 2,800 deaths, bringing the total to more than 17 million cases since the pandemic began in 2020. The death toll is believed to be undercounted, and crematoriums and burial grounds are overrun. Several hospitals have called for emergency supplies as oxygen stocks fell short.

 

Social media in India are flooded with calls for help from families and hospitals running low on supplies. The authorities are scrambling to bolster a health infrastructure that is crumbling under the rising flood of cases. Community groups have also stepped up to support people who are struggling due to acute shortages in medicines, oxygen, ventilators, hospital beds, ambulances, and cremation and burial services.

 

A rights-respecting response to Covid-19 should ensure that accurate and up-to-date information about the virus, access to services, service disruptions, and other aspects of the response to the outbreak is readily available and accessible to all. The government’s censoring of free speech will ultimately limit effective communication about the pandemic and undermine trust in government actions.

 

Healthcare experts have criticized the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government for failing to invest in the country’s weak health infrastructure since the pandemic began. Although the authorities have advocated using masks and other public health practices, they conveyed contradictory messages by claiming that they have beaten the virus while allowing and participating in large-scale gatherings, including election campaign rallies. The government promoted a Hindu religious event in which millions of people participated.

 

Courts have repeatedly criticized the government for its failure to adequately address the pandemic. “You had all of last year to plan and take a decision,” said Sanjib Banerjee, the chief justice of the Madras High Court. “If it had been done, we would not be in this situation... We were lulled into a false sense of security only to be hit by this tsunami of infection now.”

 

Under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which India has ratified, everyone has the right to “the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.” The right to health provides that governments must take effective steps to ensure that health facilities, goods, and services are available in sufficient quantity, accessible to everyone without discrimination, and affordable for all, including marginalized groups.

 

The government should immediately take steps to remove bottlenecks in supply chains of essential medical goods and services, and to ensure an adequate supply of oxygen, life-saving medicines, ventilators, and testing kits.

 

 

Because of the domestic crisis, the Indian government has temporarily suspended exports of vaccines produced in India. The United States is allocating to India raw materials critical for vaccine production so that Indian manufacturers can address the shortage of vaccines in India and elsewhere. However, the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, and others should also end their opposition to India and South Africa’s proposal at the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS Council. The October 2020 proposal would temporarily waive certain intellectual property rules on Covid-19-related vaccines, therapeutics, and other medical products to facilitate increased manufacturing to make them available and affordable globally.

 

The Indian government has ignored calls from the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights for governments to release “every person detained without sufficient legal basis, including political prisoners, and those detained for critical, dissenting views” to prevent the growing rates of infection everywhere, including in closed facilities, such as prisons and detention centers. Instead, the BJP-led government has increasingly brought politically motivated cases against human rights defenders, journalists, peaceful protesters, and other critics, and jailed them under draconian sedition and counterterrorism laws, even during the pandemic.

 

The Indian government should take immediate steps to release all those jailed on politically motivated charges for peaceful dissent and consider reducing prison populations through appropriate supervision or early release of low-risk category of detainees. Detained individuals at high risk of suffering serious effects from the virus, such as older people, people with disabilities or with underlying health conditions, should also be considered for similar release.

 

“The Indian government should put people above politics and ensure that everyone gets the medical care they need.  The administration has called for citizens and international governments to help, but it cannot shirk its own responsibility to protect each and every life.”

 

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @  # LIG-2   No  761,

HUDCO  FIRST  STAGE , OPP WůATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL

,MYSURU – 570017  KARNATAKA  INDIA     Cell : 91 8970318202

  WhatsApp  91  8970318202

 

Home page :

http://di.dalitonline.in  

https://di-weekly.blogspot.com   

 

Contact  :  DI@dalitonline.in   , deccan.inquirer@gmail.com   

 

 

 

 

 

Bad Medicine

    DECCAN  INQUIRER Weekly e news paper Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.02.....Issue.45.................10/11/2021     IN THE SUPREME COURT OF I...