DECCAN INQUIRER
Weekly e news paper
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.02.....Issue.12…...........24/03/2021
Answer Honourable
Cabinet Secretary, DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION , GOI
NEW DELHI
Refer
RTI APPLICATION No :
DGTHQ/R/E/20/00104
We
salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them.
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT
BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES ,
BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS.
WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS
IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC
SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.
M/s
Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom
Ltd again renamed as M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as
M/s KEC International , Mysore used to manufacture PIJF &
OFC telecables and supplied it to department of
telecommunications , government of india , Indian Railways and GAIL ,
PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to pay
hundreds of crores of rupees from public exchequer to buy these cables .
There is also one more company by name M/s Concepta Cables Ltd ,
Mysore belonging to the same industrial group supplying PIJF
& OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a
citizen of india and as a tax payer I want to know
whether those crores of rupees from public exchequer are well spent.
1.
How many times the above said companies were blacklisted
by DOT , Supreme Court of India and other quasi judicial bodies ,
casewise ?
2.
What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the
above companies , casewise ?
3.
How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies
, were rejected by DOT from the field yearwise , since 1986 ?
4.
Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT
& make good all the losses , yearwise ?
5.
If not , why ?
6.
What action taken by DOT , casewise ?
7.
How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies
were accepted on deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what
basis ?
8.
Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled
materials in the manufacture of cables ?
9.
If yes , on what basis ?
10.
Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing
process by above companies to third parties
, casewise ?
11.
How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies
have failed during usage within the warranty period ,
yearwise ?
12.
Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all
such cases ?
13.
If not why , casewise ?
14.
What action by DOT , casewise ?
15.
Did KTL / RPG TELECOM / RPG CABLES violate norms laid
down by DOT / BSNL , etc ?
16.
RPG cables taking orders for cables from government but getting it manufactured
in Concepta cables and vice versa, is it legal ? What action by DOT
, BSNL , MTNL ,etc ?
16.
To my previous rti requests and appeals you gave half truth
information to few questions and for most questions you didn't
answer. Your denial of information helped crime cover ups and aided
criminals to escape & commit more crimes unabated. Crime cover
up and aid to crime in itself is one more crime. Why should not you be together
with Secretary DOT legally prosecuted for the same.
17.
Give me the list of legal actions taken by DOT against Reliance
Infocom and Reliance Jio for recovery of public money viz failure to pay
switching fees , loss of money due to getting license for data only
paying lowest money but getting freebies of voice / telecom service
at the cost of data only , rerouting of international calls as
local calls , for failure to pay charges for using telecom infrastructure
of DOT , BSNL, MTNL.
18.
Is license issued to Reliance infocom and Reliance Jio
legal ?
19.
BSNL, private players like jio levy penalty , interest on post paid telephone
subscribers when they make delayed bill payments. After certain period
service line itself will be ruthlessly cut. When this is the ground
reality why Jio and other private telecom players are given twenty years period
by supreme court in addition to discounted rate. Has the DOT submitted an
appeal in the Supreme Court of India for the review of it's order ( by Justice
Arun Mishra ) regarding AGR dues ?
20.
Why not yet DOT stopped providing telecom infrastructure service to defaulting
private telecom companies ?
21.
Is it not loss to public exchequer ? Beneficiaries ?
Date : 24.03.2021. Nagaraja M R
Place : Mysuru. Editor
Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ #
LIG-2 No 761,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WůATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR ,
HEBBAL
,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA Cell
: 91 8970318202
WhatsApp 91 8970318202
Home page :
https://di-weekly.blogspot.com
Contact : DI@dalitonline.in
, deccan.inquirer@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment